5 Myths About Autism
Autism is often misunderstood, leading to widespread myths that shape social attitudes, policies, and personal expectations. Here, we debunk five common misconceptions using insights from recent research and the neurodiversity paradigm.
Myth 1: Autism is a Mental Health Condition
Many people assume that autism is a mental health disorder, similar to depression or anxiety. While autism is formally classified in psychiatric manuals (DSM‑5, ICD‑11) as a neurodevelopmental condition, the neurodiversity paradigm reframes it as a natural neurological difference rather than a pathology (Pellicano & den Houting, 2024; Bottini et al., 2023).
- Neurological Difference, Not Disorder: Autism represents a variation in brain development and cognition, rather than a dysfunction to be “fixed.”
- Focus on Acceptance: Neurodiversity advocates emphasise supporting autistic individuals by adapting environments and reducing societal barriers, rather than trying to cure or remediate them.
- Language Matters: Shifting from terms like “disorder” and “deficit” to “difference,” “challenges,” and “supports” highlights the move towards acceptance and respect for autistic identities.
In short, autism is not inherently a mental health problem—it is a difference in how the brain develops and experiences the world.
Myth 2: Autistic Individuals Lack Empathy
The idea that autistic people lack empathy is one of the most persistent myths. Research suggests the reality is far more nuanced.
- Emotional vs. Cognitive Empathy: Autistic individuals often have intact or even heightened emotional empathy (EE)—the ability to feel what others feel. Challenges may appear in cognitive empathy (CE), which involves understanding others’ perspectives (Bollen, 2023; Shalev et al., 2022).
- Empathic Disequilibrium: Many autistic people experience EE-dominance, meaning their emotional responses can be stronger than their cognitive understanding. This can sometimes be overwhelming, giving the false impression of a “lack of empathy” (Shalev et al., 2022).
- The Double Empathy Problem: Social miscommunication is reciprocal. Non-autistic people often misunderstand autistic social cues just as much as the reverse. Difficulties in social interaction are about mismatched perspectives, not an absence of empathy (Milton, 2012).
Empathy in autism is complex and context-dependent. Autistic people feel deeply and respond emotionally, even if they interpret social signals differently from neurotypical expectations.
Myth 3: Autism is a Learning Disability
Autism itself is not a learning disability. While some autistic individuals may have learning challenges, many have average or above-average intellectual abilities.
- Learning profiles in autism are diverse. Some may excel in certain areas while struggling in others, but this is not evidence of an inherent “disability” in learning.
- Educational and social barriers often create challenges, rather than autism inherently limiting intellectual potential (Pellicano & den Houting, 2024).
Myth 4: Autistic Individuals Have Special Abilities
While some autistic people may have exceptional skills (sometimes referred to as “savant abilities”), this is the exception, not the rule.
- The neurodiversity paradigm emphasises everyday strengths and differences, rather than assuming extraordinary talent (Bottini et al., 2023).
- Autistic individuals are unique, with diverse abilities, interests, and perspectives—but expecting extraordinary skills in every autistic person is misleading and unfair.
Myth 5: Autism Can Be “Fixed” or “Cured”
Autism is not an illness to be cured. Attempts to normalise autistic behaviour, especially interventions aiming to make autistic children “indistinguishable” from peers, can be harmful.
- Neurodiversity supports acceptance and accommodation, not conformity (Pellicano & den Houting, 2024).
- Supports should focus on reducing environmental barriers, promoting autonomy, and fostering self-determination, rather than eliminating autistic traits.
Conclusion
Autism is a natural variation in human neurology, not a mental illness or deficit. Misconceptions about empathy, learning, and abilities stem from outdated medical models and societal misunderstandings. By embracing the neurodiversity paradigm, we can replace myths with respect, acceptance, and a recognition of the rich diversity autistic individuals bring to the world.
References
Bollen, C. (2023). A reflective guide on the meaning of empathy in autism research. Methods in Psychology, 8, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2022.100109
Bottini, S. B., Morton, H. E., Buchanan, K. A., & Gould, K. (2023). Moving from disorder to difference: A systematic review of recent language use in autism research. Journal of Autism Studies, 6(2).
Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem.’ Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2024). Annual research review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Autism in Adulthood, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2023.0030
Shalev, I., Warrier, V., Greenberg, D. M., Smith, P., Allison, C., Baron‑Cohen, S., Eran, A., & Uzefovsky, F. (2022). Reexamining empathy in autism: Empathic disequilibrium as a novel predictor of autism diagnosis and autistic traits. Autism Research, 15(10), 1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2794



